Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Scientific practice and ordinatory action : ethnomethodology and social studies of science / Michael Lynch

Main Author Lynch, Michael, 1948- Country Reino Unido. Publication Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1997 Description XXI, 333 p. : il. ; 23 cm ISBN 0-521-59742-0 CDU 303
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Monografia Biblioteca Geral da Universidade do Minho
BGUMD 9743 Available 210610
Total holds: 0

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

Philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science have grown interested in the daily practices of scientists. Recent studies have drawn linkages between scientific innovations and more ordinary procedures, craft skills, and sources of sponsorship. These studies dispute the idea that science is the application of a unified method or the outgrowth of a progressive history of ideas. This book critically reviews arguments and empirical studies in two areas of sociology that have played a significant role in the 'sociological turn' in science studies: ethnomethodology (the study of ordinary practical reasoning) and the sociology of scientific knowledge. In both fields, efforts to study scientific practices have led to intractable difficulties and debates, due in part to scientistic and foundationalist commitments that remain entrenched with social-scientific research policies and descriptive language. The central purpose of this book is to explore the possibility of an empirical approach to the epistemic contents of science that avoids the pitfalls of scientism and foundationalism.

Table of contents provided by Syndetics

  • Introduction
  • 1 Ethnomethodology
  • 2 The demise of the 'old' sociology of science
  • 3 The rise of the new sociology of scientific knowledge
  • 4 Phenomenology and protoethnomethodology
  • 5 Wittgenstein, rules, and epistemology's topic
  • 6 Molecular sociology
  • 7 From quiddity to haecceity: ethnomethodological studies of work
  • Conclusion

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.